Let’s analyze the Bears draft, both as individual players
and what they say in the greater scheme of things.
Shea McClellin, DE, Boise St. A versatile player, McClellin is a hard
worker with great speed coming off the edge.
He played all over the defense for Boise St and is good in
coverage. He seems to be a better fit as
a 3-4 OLB and there’s some question as to how well he’ll defend the run as a
4-3 DE.
Alshon Jeffery, WR, South Carolina. Widely considered a top-10 pick heading into
2011, Jeffery struggled with weight issues during the 2011 season. Playing most of the season between 230-240
pounds, Jeffery looked significantly more sluggish than he did in his excellent
2010 season. Currently at 215, the Bears
felt comfortable enough with the 6’4” WR to trade up in the 2nd
round to draft him. Jeffery could
provide excellent play at flanker for the Bears or he could balloon again and
have very little value. A real boom or
bust prospect.
Brandon Hardin, S, Oregon State. Considered a 3rd round prospect
after 2010, Hardin missed the 2011 season after surgery to repair a broken
shoulder. Because he’s coming off an
injury and a season in which he didn’t play, he is generally considered a reach
at this pick. He does have ideal size
for a safety though (he played corner in college) and he will bring great speed
to the Bears’ defensive backfield.
Evan Rodriguez, TE, Temple.
Played a lot of H-back at Temple, but as a pure pass catching tight end
there were few better. Numbers weren’t
impressive due to limited opportunities, but he has great speed, great body
control and excellent hands. Due to his
time at H-back, he’s a willing blocker and it’s not uncommon to see him
downfield making blocks at the 2nd level.
Isaiah Frey, CB, Nevada.
A corner with good size and speed who was expected by most to go
undrafted. Despite his size, he doesn’t
play physical enough and needs to disrupt WR’s routes more. He did tie for first in the nation with 21
passes deflected, although most attribute that to poor QB play in the WAC.
Greg McCoy, CB, TCU. Another
corner who was expected to go undrafted (who cares though, at this point in the
7th round), McCoy’s primary production in college came on special
teams. He averaged 32 yds per kick
return over 47 attempts in his time at TCU.
Instead of grading each Bears selection (or the draft as a
whole), let’s analyze what this group says about Phil Emery and what he wants
to do with this team.
First, it says that
he values speed. Every one of these
players has a 40 time under 4.6 seconds.
Second, he wanted more weapons for Jay Cutler. Adding Brandon Marshall wasn’t enough. He traded up to get Alshon Jeffery and used
his 4th round pick on a receiving tight end. This offense should be significantly more
dangerous this year than any in recent memory.
Third, he values special teams. Every player drafted, except Jeffery, can
contribute on special teams. Emery
showed that he values special teams with some of the free agents he pursued and
the draft was no different.
Fourth, he values versatility. This is more than just having guys who can
fill in elsewhere in case of injury. It’s
much deeper than that. For defenders,
the value is two-fold. First, it allows
for more creativity/movement/shifting and general confusion pre-snap. There were many times last year that Julius
Peppers would line up at DT in order to create confusion or exploit a mismatch. Shea McClellin gives the Bears another player
who can play multiple positions. The
impact of his versatility, though, will be more relevant when offenses sub
players in and change personnel packages.
Right now in the NFL, offenses seem to have an upper hand with the different personnel looks they give
a defense. You see it every Sunday;
defenses trying to sub players in at the last second because they don’t match
up well with the personnel that the offense has brought onto the field. McClellin will help neutralize that
advantage. He will play DE most of the
time with his hand on the ground. If
needed, though, he can shift back and play linebacker. He can effectively drop back into coverage. His presence on the field could be one less
mismatch for the offense to exploit. It
could be one less timeout wasted on defense.
That part of his game has to be considered when discussing his value.
The value of this type of versatility for offensive players
is even clearer. We can create the
mismatches I just spoke of without subbing players on and off the field. Imagine this:
the Bears can now line up in 21 personnel (2 RB’s, 1 TE, 2 WR’s) with
Matt Forte at halfback and Evan Rodriguez at fullback. Then, on the next play, they can keep the
same players on the field, split BOTH of those RB’s out wide and have a
legitimate 5 WR’s on the field. I’m sure
you can imagine the mismatches this would set up.
No comments:
Post a Comment